To begin, executives should collaborate closely with their executive search consultant to gain a thorough understanding of the position specifications. Developed jointly by the retained executive search firm and the hiring organization, these “specs” typically include an overview of the organization—its mission, vision, values, and strategic goals.
The specifications also outline the position’s key priorities and responsibilities, such as “identifying innovative labor expense avoidance strategies” or “attracting, retaining, developing, and leading a high-performing internal team.” In addition, they define the required qualifications, experience, and personal attributes sought in an ideal candidate.
Although search consultants almost always provide finalists with copies of the position specifications, executives are encouraged to ask thoughtful, probing questions such as the following:
Executive candidates should proactively network with trusted colleagues, peers, and industry leaders to gain informed, insider perspectives on the hiring organization and its culture. During these confidential, private conversations, candidates may wish to explore topics such as the following:
Executive candidates who advance to the final round of interviews for senior leadership positions must go beyond simply reiterating the information contained in their résumés. Hiring organizations typically pose thoughtful, probing questions that invite candidates to reflect on their past accomplishments, address current priorities, and articulate a clear vision for the future.
In preparing for these high-level interviews, candidates should consider questions such as the following:
Many executive interviews include behavioral questions where interviewers ask candidates to tell a story around a specific situation. Among these behavioral questions are the following:
For questions that measure emotional intelligence, see http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/248524
Executives should stay well-informed about current and emerging trends shaping the industry. In healthcare, this means maintaining fluency in areas such as healthcare transformation, system consolidation, evolving clinical care models, organizational integration, advancements in artificial intelligence and technology, and enhanced consumer and community engagement. Review recent reports, studies, news features, and thought-leadership content to understand the implications of these trends and identify potential strategic responses.
Equally important, executives should be prepared to connect broad industry developments to the hiring organization’s clinical, financial, and operational priorities. Consider, for example, how the organization might drive improvements in quality, safety, efficiency, engagement, collaboration, outcomes, and cost management—and how these gains would advance its mission, vision, values, and strategic priorities, such as the following:
Consult the organization’s Web site, which will often include an “about” or “who we are” section” with strategic plans, annual reports, fact sheets, news coverage, leadership profiles and links to videos.
Just as C-Suite executives must prepare to answer the questions of executives and board members, they must also ask their own series of questions as they speak with board members, C-Suite executives, employees and clinicians. Among the possible questions are the following:
Hiring organizations want insight into how final candidates will perform and lead others. While some hiring organizations rely on in-house tools, many turn to HOGAN’s Executive Competency Assessment Tool. Based on the HOGAN Personality Inventory, this tool predicts candidates’ future performance and competence by relying on the Five Factor Model, which includes openness to experience, emotional stability, dependability, extroversion and agreeableness.
HOGAN converts assessment results into 23 competencies needed for C-Suite executive performance and leadership. Among them are the following:
Interpersonal: communication and interpersonal relations, influence and networking, conflict management; politeness, cooperation and teamwork
Intrapersonal: reliability, consistency, prudence, flexibility and adaptation and commitment to development
Leadership: prioritizing, management independence, objectiveness, achievement orientation and interest reinforcement
With these results the executive search firm and hiring organization can decide how well final candidates would rise to the expectations of the C-Suite or board role. They can also identify those who would fit within the hiring organization’s culture and perform best in challenging situations.
C-Suite and board executives should be open to the assessment experience. However, they should also realize that there’s little they can do to prepare for assessment. Since there are no right or wrong answers, the best approach is be candid and direct.
Executive search consultants always request that senior-level candidates provide a list of four to six professional references. These individuals should be trusted, respected, and well-positioned to speak credibly about the candidate’s qualifications in relation to the role’s requirements. Candidates should also consider how effectively each reference can respond to open-ended questions such as the following:
The best reference checks provide a 360-degree view of a candidate’s personality, character, on-the-job performance and leadership style, including how well the executive collaborates and innovates within teams. To that end, the executive search firm or hiring organization tend to consult varied sources, including the following:
Reference checking rarely ends with the formal list of contacts provided by the candidate. Executive search firms or hiring organizations often conduct secondary reference checks with additional sources who can offer independent perspectives. Skilled reference checkers are adept at reading between the lines. For example, if a checker asks, “What is the candidate like outside of work?” and the source replies, “I don’t really know the candidate on a personal level,” the response may suggest limited interpersonal engagement or underdeveloped social skills.